Roofing Insurance Laws in South Dakota

Informational only — not legal advice. Laws and case precedent change, and outcomes depend on your specific policy language. Verify current law with your state Department of Insurance or a qualified attorney before relying on it.

Can insurers depreciate labor when calculating ACV?

Unsettled

South Dakota has no law on depreciating labor. Your policy's definition of actual cash value controls, and carriers writing in South Dakota routinely depreciate labor on ACV settlements. If the policy does not define ACV, the state's general broad evidence rule applies, but it does not answer the labor question either way.

Authority

No provision of SDCL Title 58 and no Division of Insurance rule or bulletin addresses depreciation of labor in an actual cash value calculation. South Dakota's general ACV standard is the broad evidence rule, adopted in Lampe Market Co. v. Alliance Insurance Co., 22 N.W.2d 427 (S.D. 1946). That decision does not reach depreciation of labor, and no later South Dakota appellate decision does.

South Dakota Codified Laws, Title 58 (Insurance) · South Dakota Division of Insurance - Laws, Rules & Bulletins

Must insurers replace undamaged materials so the repair matches?

Unsettled

South Dakota has no matching or uniform-appearance law for roof claims. Whether the carrier owes undamaged slopes, or the full roof, turns entirely on the policy language, typically the "like kind and quality" wording and any cosmetic-damage or anti-matching endorsement. Build your matching argument out of the policy and the physical evidence, not out of state law.

Authority

SDCL Title 58 contains no matching requirement. ARSD Article 20:06, the property and casualty insurance rules, contains no "reasonably uniform appearance" provision of the kind other states adopted from the NAIC model. The Division of Insurance has issued no bulletin on matching, and no South Dakota appellate decision resolves it.

South Dakota Division of Insurance — Laws, Rules & Bulletins (official DOI .gov index; verified live, no matching/uniform-appearance rule or bulletin listed) · South Dakota Codified Laws Title 58 (insurance statutes; no matching requirement) · ARSD Administrative Rules Article 20:06 (South Dakota property/casualty insurance rules; contains no matching / uniform-appearance provision)

Can a contractor pay or waive the homeowner's deductible?

Prohibited

South Dakota bans roofing contractors from paying or rebating a homeowner's insurance deductible, and bans advertising or promising to do it. Advertising the offer is a violation on its own, whether or not you ever perform the work. A contract made in violation of the statute is null and void, so you lose the right to enforce it.

You may

Bill the carrier the price you actually charge
Offer a payment plan for the deductible
Refer the homeowner to third-party financing
Give a genuine, disclosed discount off your real price
Explain that the deductible is the homeowner's obligation
Document the deductible as collected in your file

You may not

Pay, absorb, or rebate any part of the deductible
Advertise or promise a deductible rebate
Offer "no out-of-pocket" or "we cover your deductible"
Inflate the estimate to build the deductible back in
Credit the deductible as a rebate, gift, or free upgrade
Bill the carrier a price you do not intend to collect

Penalty: A contract made in violation is null and void, and the conduct sits in the Deceptive Trade Practices chapter, enforceable by the Attorney General.

Authority

SDCL 37-24-50 provides that no contractor providing residential roofing goods and services may advertise or promise to pay or rebate all or part of any applicable insurance deductible, and that a contract made in violation is null and void. SDCL 37-24-49 defines the covered contractor as a residential building contractor providing roofing services, a residential remodeler providing roofing services, or a residential roofer. Enacted by 2012 SB 145. The statute sits in SDCL ch. 37-24, Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection, enforced by the Attorney General. The prohibition is written around advertising or promising to pay or rebate. A genuine discount off the price you actually charge is not a deductible rebate, but the carrier then owes proportionally less, so it does not spare the homeowner the deductible. Financing the deductible is lending against it, not waiving it, and remains lawful. SDCL 37-24-51 separately requires every residential storm-damage roofing contract to carry a 72-hour cancellation right, a boldface cancellation statement, and a detachable notice of cancellation form.

SD DOJ / Consumer Protection — Deceptive Trade Practices statutes (Title 37-24), full text of §§ 37-24-49, 37-24-50, 37-24-51 · 2012 SB 145 session-law text (mylrc.sdlegislature.gov) — enacting the roofing deductible prohibition · SDCL Chapter 37-24 — Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection (SD Legislature)

Can a contractor negotiate the homeowner's claim?

No specific statute

South Dakota does not license public adjusters, and no statute bars a roofing contractor from dealing with the carrier on a homeowner's claim. You may write and submit your scope, estimate, and supplements, and argue line items, pricing, and code items with the adjuster. There is no unlicensed-adjusting offense to commit, but the roofing contract rules, the unauthorized practice of law, and the insurance fraud statute still bind you.

You may

Prepare the scope and estimate for the loss
Submit supplements and price justification to the carrier
Meet the adjuster on the roof and walk the damage
Argue line items, quantities, and unit pricing
Cite code requirements that drive the repair
Discuss settlement of your own work with the carrier

You may not

Interpret the policy or advise on coverage rights
Submit an estimate you know overstates the work or price
Assist in preparing a claim document you know is false
Advertise or promise to pay or rebate the deductible
Omit the 72-hour cancellation notice from a storm contract
Bill for work you did not perform

Penalty: A fraudulent insurance act is a Class 2 misdemeanor at $400 or less, a Class 1 misdemeanor above $400 and under $1,000, and a Class 4 felony at $1,000 or more.

Authority

South Dakota has no adjuster license. SDCL Title 58 runs from chapter 58-1 through 58-49 with no public adjuster or independent adjuster chapter, and the only appearance of "adjuster" in the title is SDCL 58-18B-49, on establishing risk adjusters. The Division of Insurance licenses producers, not adjusters. The producer license does not reach claim work. SDCL 58-30-143 requires a license only to sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance, and SDCL 58-30-142(8) defines "negotiate" as conferring with or advising a purchaser about the substantive benefits, terms, or conditions of a particular contract of insurance, and only where the person sells insurance or obtains insurance from insurers for purchasers. That is policy placement, not claim settlement. SDCL 58-30-144(1)(b) confirms the point from the other side by exempting employees of an insurer or producer whose function relates to processing, adjusting, investigating, or settling claims. The roofing-specific rules apply. SDCL 37-24-49 defines the covered contractor; SDCL 37-24-50 bars advertising or promising to pay or rebate any part of the deductible and voids a violating contract; SDCL 37-24-51 requires the 72-hour cancellation right, boldface disclosure, and detachable notice form on residential storm-damage roofing contracts. None of the three mentions negotiating or adjusting a claim. Enforcement of chapter 37-24 runs through the Attorney General under SDCL 37-24-12 for deceptive acts defined in SDCL 37-24-6. Two outer limits. Interpreting the policy or advising the homeowner on coverage rights can shade into unauthorized practice of law. SDCL 58-4A-2(6)-(7) makes it a fraudulent insurance act to knowingly present, or assist in preparing, a claim statement containing false, incomplete, or misleading material information.

SDCL 37-24-49 — "Contractor" defined for §§ 37-24-50 and 37-24-51 (verified text) · SDCL 37-24-50 — Contractor rebate of insurance deductible prohibited; contract null and void (verified text) · SDCL 37-24-51 — Cancellation of storm damage roofing repair contract; 72 hours, boldface notice, detachable form (verified text) · SDCL 58-30-142 — Definitions, incl. (8) "Negotiate" (verified text) · SDCL 58-30-143 — License required only to sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance (verified text) · SDCL 58-30-144 — License not required under certain circumstances (verified text) · SDCL Title 58 (Insurance) chapter and section index — chapters 58-1 to 58-49, no public/independent adjuster chapter · SDCL 58-18B-49 — "Establishing risk adjusters" (the only use of "adjuster" in Title 58) · SDCL 58-4A-2 — Fraudulent insurance acts; misdemeanor/felony grading (verified text) · SDCL 37-24-6 — Deceptive act or practice--Penalty · SDCL 37-24-12 — Attorney General's investigative demand (chapter 37-24 enforcement) · South Dakota Division of Insurance, Dept. of Labor & Regulation (licensing: insurance producers; no adjuster license offered)

South Carolina Compare all states Tennessee

Make sure the South Dakota claim pays what it should

ClaimSpark checks depreciation, matching, and scope against what the job requires — and supplements when the carrier comes up short.

Start Free